Northern California Mortgage Mods Rotating Header Image

Is Your Lender Picking Your Pocket?

Banks Pick Homeowner's Pockets With Insurance

Banks Pick Homeowner's Pockets With InsuranceForce-placed insurance on your home protects only the lender, not you.

Please repeat:  force-placed insurance protects only the lender, not you.

When the mortgage company buys the insurance on your home, you lose.

Every mortgage or deed of trust requires that the borrower have insurance to protect the structure in case of fire or other casualty.

It assures the lender that if disaster strikes, there is protection for its investment in your home.

If you let that insurance lapse, the lender can and will obtain coverage on the property, and add the cost of the policy to the loan.

I can’t tell you how often my clients assure me that the lender has insured their home, believing that they are covered.

Whoa!  What the lender has insured is the lender’s interest in the home.  The policy is only large enough to protect the bank;  the bank is not buying a policy large enough to cover your interest in the home.

What’s covered

Suppose that you have a $200,000 loan on a piece of realty that’s worth $500,000.  If you let your coverage lapse, the bank will get insurance with $200,000 in coverage.  Your $300,000 interest in the property is uninsured.  The bank doesn’t care if you suffer a loss when there’s a catastrophe;  it goes out of pocket only enough to protect its exposure.

The “out-of-pocket” phrase brings up another issue.  Force-placed insurance is notorious expensive, two, three or four times as expensive as a policy the homeowner can buy to protect the entire value of the house and provide for other insurance protections from liability.  The suspicion for years has been that the price of force placed insurance is inflated because the lender either owns the insurer who writes the policy, or has a kick back arrangement with them.

The inflated cost of this insurance gets added to the loan balance, and, in the end, added to the lender’s profits on the deal.

The New York state Department of Financial Services  has begun an investigation of the lender practices on force-placed insurance. Gretchen Mortgenson quotes the head of the agency

“Force-placed insurance appears to be the dirty little secret of the mortgage industry,” Mr. Lawsky said in an interview last week. “It is a silent killer harming both consumer and investors while enriching the banks and their affiliates.”

Stay tuned for developments in this investigation.  Mortgenson pointedly notes that the big mortgage lenders “declined to comment” on the inquiry.

What’s not covered

What the homeowner also loses when the bank buys the coverage is the range of insurance protection for injuries that occur on the property, not to the property.  Homeowner’s insurance protects the property owner from claims for slip and fall on the front porch, for example, and for damage or loss to the contents of the house.  You can bet that the bank isn’t paying to protect you from these kinds of loss.

Even if you have decided to walk away from a home that isn’t affordable, keeping liability insurance in place is critical.  Our legal system makes property owners responsible for most accidents that occur on their property.  The property remains yours until title changes as a result of a foreclosure.

So, unless you are willing to have your future shadowed by uninsured claims for injury on property you are shedding, keep a liability policy in place as long as you are the owner.

If you are keeping the property, arrange for your own insurance that protects both you and the bank, at a price that’s fair.

© immortal9000 – Fotolia.com

Is There Such A Thing As An Independent Foreclosure Review?

Recourse for Illegal ForeclosuresThe form in the mail promised an independent review of your lender’s foreclosure practices.

However, it  looked a lot like come-ons from scammers.

Two clients this week asked if this was real and whether they should sign up.

I read the form and did a little research.  I concluded

One, it is real.

Two, it may not make much difference.

The Federal Reserve has required several misbehaving  lenders and loan servicers to offer borrowers an independent review of their foreclosure. The mortgage servicers subject to the Fed’s enforcement action are

  • GMAC Mortgage,
  • HSBC Finance Corporation,
  • SunTrust Mortgage, and
  • EMC Mortgage Corporation-

The Comptroller of the Currency  regulates another class of lenders, and it has required a foreclosure review of this group of servicers

America’s Servicing Company

Countrywide National City
Aurora Loan Services EMC PNC
Bank of America Everbank/Everhome Sovereign Bank
Beneficial GMAC Mortgage SunTrust Mortgage
Chase HFC U.S. Bank
Citibank HSBC Wachovia
CitiFinancial IndyMac Mortgage Services Washington Mutual
CitiMortgage Metlife Bank Wells Fargo
Wilshire Credit Corporation 

 

The program offers the prospect of money damages where foreclosure procedures were defective.

The New York Time’s Gretchen Mortgenson is not hopeful.  Her Christmas Day column detailed charges that the “independent” auditors are in bed with the banks they are supposed to be evaluating.

The National Consumer Law Center is likewise skeptical.  NCLC claims the review process may harm homeowners in that it threatens to strip homeowners of their claims with respect to irregularities in the underlying loans.

The servicers subject to review have set up a site to answer questions on the review process.

Letters to eligible homeowners were expected to have gone out in the last two months of 2011.   The application must be returned with a postmark no later than April 30, 2012.

We’ll follow this story as it develops.

Image courtesy of ImageMD.

5 Things That Can Be Done If You Are Behind In Your Mortgage Payment

Since the hope of a judicially supervised mortgage modification in bankruptcy seems to have died in the Senate, let’s examine the available options to resolve a mortgage deficiency.

Once you get behind, mortgage arrears can snowball to a point where you can’t just “catch up.”  When that happens, there are 5 things you can do:

1.    List and sell the house. If you can’t make the payments, selling the home pays off the mortgage and may even give you some cash to buy a new home.  This used to be the quick, easy solution, but not in today’s economy.   Houses just aren’t selling and the norm is that you probably owe more than the home is worth.

2.    You can do a short sale.  This requires the mortgage company to accept less than what is due, so that you can sell your house to someone for its true market value.  This will pay the first mortgage, but may not pay a 2nd Mortgage or Line of Credit. And you won’t get anything out of the sale: any money received will go to the realtor, costs of sale and the mortgage company.

3.    You can get a mortgage modification. The mortgage company can reduce the interest rate on your mortgage (thereby lowering your monthly payment); can add arrears to the end of the loan, (so you are not behind anymore); or can even change the amount you owe altogether.  Unfortunately, in spite of the fact that there are federal and state laws that encourage such programs, modifications are scarce.  Lenders have all sorts of conditions placed on the process and there is no legal requirement that anyone be granted a modification.

4.    You can pay the arrearage. Unfortunately, mortgage companies want you to do this all at once.  If you can’t come up with that much in cash, you can seek bankruptcy protection (typically a Chapter 13 bankruptcy) and spread the amount you are behind over several years.

5.    You can walk away and allow the property to be foreclosed. (This is often a much better solution than it sounds, since you get to stay in the house for months rent-free before moving and there will be nothing due to the mortgage company even if they don’t recoup all of the money owed.)

There are advantages and disadvantages to all of the above, and over the next several weeks, we will examine each of these “remedies,” in greater detail.

Lifeline for Underwater Homes

The parent agency for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is considering a proposal for mortgage pay down through Chapter 13, Reuters reports.  The White House denies interest in the plan.

The Principal Pay Down Plan, conceived by Norma Hammes, a San Jose bankruptcy lawyer, and promoted by NACBA, would allow homeowners in Chapter 13 bankruptcy with an underwater mortgage to direct up to five years of their payments on the mortgage to the reduction of the principal outstanding.  The plan would not otherwise change the mortgage terms.

As proposed, the plan would only apply to home loans owned or controlled by Fannie and Freddie, which make up about 90% of U.S. mortgages.

By devoting five years of payments to principal, homeowners, who now have few economic reasons to keep paying on debt tied to houses with shrunken value, could build up equity and a financial stake in otherwise overencumbered homes.

It’s our opinion here at NorCalMortgageMods that a recovery of the California economy is tied, top and tail, to the housing market.  Congress failed to pass the judicial mortgage modification bill for bankruptcy relief to homeowners two years ago.  The Administration’s encouragement of mortgage modification has been insipid and ineffectual.

If this plan doesn’t suit the White House, what is their proposal?

 

 

Settlement with Banks = Trust and Recovery?

The Wall Street Journal reports that banks and a number of states are close to a settlement.  It is estimated that $19 Billion would be paid and banks would be monitored by an agreed upon third party, to ensure compliance with the terms of the deal.  Although nothing has been announced the article notes that the Obama Administration is pushing for a 50 state deal in attempts to put an end to the foreclosure log jam.

With so many states strapped for cash the settlement will no doubt be a welcomed pay day. Similarly with the election year ahead the incumbent wants signs the economy is recovering well before November rolls around. External pressure aside the American people are ready to move on with their lives and get back to work.  It is unclear how resolving claims against the big banks will allow this to happen, but the link between the two is front and center in the media.

What the economy needs to move forward is trust and how the settlement will begin to rebuild the people’s trust in our economic system again is unclear.  While resolving disputes without litigation is beneficial I can’t help but think there is an opportunity in the settlement being overlooked.

Foreclosure Crisis Continues

240px-Sign_of_the_Times-Foreclosure

The New York Times states that the foreclosure crisis isn’t even half over!  Ouch!

The Times cited a report that analyzed the troubled homes from 2004 to 2008 and found that at least 2.7 million mortgages made between 2004 and 2008 have ended up in foreclosure and that there are nearly another 4 million in the same category.

According to the Times: “Put another way, ‘The nation is not even halfway through the foreclosure crisis.’”

The report, produced by the Center for Responsible Lending, also noted that certain types of loans have much higher rates of completed foreclosures and serious delinquencies. They include loans originated by brokers; hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages, option ARMs, loans with prepayment penalties and loans with high interest rates (subprime).

There’s additional analysis in the report which provides data about the impact this problem is having on minorities.
All in all, the foreclosure crisis is continuing.

 

image credit:  FlickreviewR

Get Back In The Real Estate Market After A Short Sale

Home ownership after short saleIs there  home ownership after a short sale?

One of the huge fears that keeps homeowners paying on underwater homes that overload their budget  is the worry that if they bail on the present house, it will be forever before they can buy another home.

Not so, says Keith Rockmael, a Bay Area real estate advocate.  Here’s what he wrote me on the subject:

If you listen to the media, investors and experts in the real estate everyone would be buying, buying and buying more. After all, with homes prices still soft and interest rates at ridiculously minuscule levels it would make sense. Many investors (and even owner occupiers) continue to break open their  piggy banks and dig through their mattresses to pay cash for homes.

For those without a mattress full of dinero, most people think that they can’t get a loan especially after a short sale, bankruptcy or foreclosure. Not true. People just need to look in the right place and have a relationship with a loan officer who knows their stuff.

A couple of banks and credit unions can lend to homeowners after a short sale with no waiting period or only a 90 day seasoning. Wells Fargo offers a post short sale loan if the homeowner remains current with all payments and a completed Short Sale. Homeowners needs a legitimate hardship and will likely not be able to purchase in the same city. The rates are good as it is an FHA loan.

In San Francisco, the Mission SF Credit Union can lend with no waiting period after a short sale again with no lates. Even with lates, they can lend one year after a short sale. Normally, most banks will make borrowers wait two years before they can qualify for a new loan post short sale.

With both of these loans, borrowers must show improved credit history post short-sale and the guidelines can be strict. Savvy homeowners realize that options exist for those who seek to get off the bench and back into the game.

The old bromide is that “time heals all wounds”, even to credit worthiness.  But its clear, that smart shopping for home loans can shorten the time a short seller is out of the market.

HARP 2.0 Debuts

The government has launched a revised version of HARP, designed to facilitate refinancing underwater mortgages held by Fannie and Freddie.

The expectations for the impact of the program, however, are not high.

The New York Times reports that the original program promised help to 4 to 5 million homeowners.  Perhaps, 900,000 have gotten refinances, and few of those turned out to have underwater properties.

Image courtesy of Wikimedia.

We Enter The Wider World Of The Mortgage Mess

The hope for judicially supervised mortgage modification in bankruptcy spurred us to start this site.  That hope died in the Senate  last session.

Though Congress walked away from a workable solution, and no one has produced a viable alternative, the problems of the California housing market continue.

We are widening our focus here to discuss not just legislative solutions but negotiated solutions and litigation tied to the mortgage mess.  Send us your questions and suggest housing related topics for exploration.

We live here in Northern California and we’re here to further your knowledge about your options for living through the mortgage mess.

 

Robo signers and underwater houses

States Attorney Generals, investigating defective foreclosure procedures used by the big banks, have proposed a settlement that would give homeowners a means to keep houses worth less than the debt.  Lenders would be encouraged to offer principal write-downs to make it desirable to stay in upside down homes.

NACBA has proffered a principal pay down plan which it hopes can be implemented without legislation.  The plan would utilize bankruptcy’s  Chapter 13 and would be a consensual provision of the Chapter 13 plan.  In exchange for crediting every mortgage payment during the plan to principal, the lender would get a new promissory note and a  release of  claims for past lender transgressions.

Stay tuned.