January 27th, 2009:

Changes to HR 200 as reported from committee

The House Judiciary Committee today reported the bill to enable mortgage modification in bankruptcy to the full House after addition of a “claw back” provision.  The added provision provides for a declining percentage of net sales proceeds to be paid to the crammed down lender if the house is sold during the pendency of the bankruptcy for more than the modified loan amount.

The added provision for sharing of post bankruptcy appreciation gives the afffected lender 80% of the appreciation from a sale in the first year from the effective date of the plan; 60% in the 2nd year; 40% in the 3rd year; and 20% in the 4th year.

Also added to the bill was a provision that the debtor must seek a mortgage modification directly from the lender at least 15 days before proposing a plan that modifies a mortgage.  The lender presumably has an opportunity to negotiate a modification on its own terms before the bankruptcy court can impose a modification.

The last word from the banking industry was adamant opposition to judicial mortgage modification.  Industry lobbyists did not, as far as I could tell, propose an alternative that might actually stop the foreclosure tsunami.

The Banking and Lending Industry is Fighting Hard against the Mortgage Modification Bill

Opposition to the “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy act of 2009” is coming from the banking and lending industry.  They are literally pouring millions of dollars into lobbying against this legislation, as reported by KUTV, news 2.

They argue that allowing judges to reduce mortgage payments will end up costing home owners more in the long run, because mortgage lenders will have to charge higher interest rates and require more of a down payment to offset the risk that the loan amount could be reduced by a bankruptcy judge.   

This industry has spent millions on lobbying efforts in the past year.  The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, alone, spent $57.9 million on lobbying in 2008, and is one of the ten organizations that is actively opposing this legislation in Congress.  

It’s time to get this bill passed.  It is the one thing that could save your home.  Write, fax or e-mail your Congressperson.  

House Judiciary to Meet and Vote Today

The National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys reports that:

The House Judiciary Committee will meet at 1 p.m. ET today to mark up (consider) HR 200, the “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act.”  At the time of the mark up there will be a manager’s amendment offered by Chairman Conyers that will embody the language changes agreed to in the Citigroup discussions and I expect there will be a few other changes as well.
You may watch a webcast of the mark up by going to:
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/caltoday.html.
The bill is expected to pass by a narrow margin; we don’t expect there will be any Republican votes in favor and we expect there may be a Democrat or two who opposes.
If you live in districts represented by any of the following Members, please call them THIS MORNING in support of H.R. 200 (phone numbers may be found at www.house.gov)
•    Daniel B. “Dan” Maffei (D-NY)
•    Robert Wexler (D-FL)
•    Brad Sherman (D-CA)
•    Adam B. Schiff (D-CA)
•    Charles A. Gonzalez (D-TX)
•    Pedro Pierluisi (D-PR)
Other Members of the Committee include:
•    John Conyers (D-MI) Chairman
•    Howard L. Berman (D-CA)
•    Rick Boucher (D-VA)
•    Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)
•    Robert C. “Bobby” Scott (D-VA)
•    Melvin L. Watt (D-NC)
•    Zoe Lofgren (D-CA)
•    Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX)
•    Maxine Waters (D-CA)
•    William D. Delahunt (D-MA)
•    Steve Cohen (D-TN)
•    Henry C. “Hank” Johnson (D-GA)
•    Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL)
•    Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)
•    Anthony D. Weiner (D-NY)
•    Linda T. Sánchez (D-CA)
•    Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL)