March, 2009:

Home Affordable Modifications: The Nuts and Bolts of the Obama Plan

If your disposable income has disappeared because you have experienced a change in circumstances and are struggling to make your house payments, the Obama Administration’s mortgage modification plan was designed with you in mind.

To qualify your home must be your primary residence, the amount you owe on your first mortgage must be equal to or less than $729,750 and you must have obtained the mortgage before January 1, 2009.

Do not be surprised if you qualify.  The Treasury Department’s plan released March 4th states that as many as 4 Million homeowners will receive assistance.

Qualified homeowners need to gather information to provide to their lenders including information about their gross income, their assets, any second mortgage on the house, as well as balances and minimum monthly payments on all credit cards, student loans and car loans.

The stated goal of the Home Affordable Modification program is to reduce the amount homeowners owe per month to a sustainable level in order to stabilize communities.  The target affordability level of a monthly mortgage payment is set at 31% of a homeowner’s gross income.

But the financial institutions and investors need only get the payments down to no greater than 38% of income.  Then the program matches further reductions in monthly payments dollar for dollar to reduce the debt-to-income ratio of a borrower down to 31%.

You might be asking yourself, “How is this possible? How are they doing this?”  Well, in order to reduce the debt to income ratio down to 31%, interest payments are first reduced down to as low as 2%.  If the ratio is still above 31% lenders then extend the term of the loan up to 40 years.   Finally, if the payment has not yet reached the 31%, lenders forbear principal at no interest.

In order to entice lenders, borrowers, servicers and investors, the plan offers certain incentives for loan modifications.  Servicers receive $1,000  up front for each eligible modification and also receive another $1,000 each year for up to three years when the borrower makes their modified payments.  Borrowers are enticed to make their monthly payments under the plan with $1,000 for each year that they stay current on their payments.

Loan modifications under the Treasury plan do not require the participation of junior liens and the program includes additional incentives to extinguish them. Servicers are reimbursed under the plan for the lien release according to a specified schedule and also receive an additional $250 for obtaining the release of a valid junior lien.

Notably, none of the incentive payments are made unless the modification lasts for at least three months.  And borrowers who have a debt to income ratio over 55% are required to undergo HUD counseling as a condition of the modification.

When modification is not available the Treasury plan offers servicers incentives to take alternatives to foreclosure. A future post will discuss the possibility of deeds in lieu of foreclosure, short sales and the incentives provided to the parties who agree to their terms instead of going through foreclosure.

Also present in the Home Affordable Modifications section of the plan is a concession by major mortgage insurance firms.  Those firms are said to have agreed to develop a plan by which they will accept partial claims on modified loans where it is appropriate to do so in order to avoid foreclosure.

Running through the entire Treasury plan is the sense that everyone involved is giving a little in order to minimize the impact of the foreclosure crisis by trying their best to avoid foreclosures that are otherwise uneconomic to proceed with.  Qualifying for a modification under the plan could mean that the home you have been burdened with will become affordable again.

Mortgage Modification Companies: Scams or Saviors?

New companies have sprung up to help homeowners save their homes from foreclosures by working out a modification.  This seems to be a growth industry here in Northern California, where foreclosures have been high.  

The problem is some of these “services” are simple scam artists trying to make a quick buck by preying on the unfortunate home-owner struggling to keep her home in this economy.  

How do you know who to trust?  There are a couple of basic rules to follow when seeking this kind of help.

1. First, check out the company.  Have they been around for more than a week?  Are the owners and managers trained professionals in the real estate or legal community?  Do they have a bad track record with the local Better Business Bureau or the California Department of Consumer Affairs?

2. Make sure that whoever you are speaking with is more interested in learning about your loan and the financing of your house, than how you are going to come up with the money to pay them.

3. Get some deadlines. These kinds of modifications take time, certainly, but a reputable company should be able to give you some specific periods of action.  

4. Follow your instincts.  If the salesperson is telling you what seems too good to be true, it probably is – find another company.

Modifications are out there.  They can turn around a nasty loan or difficult situation, but you need to be careful not to throw a couple of thousand dollars away on a “here today; gone tomorrow” company.  

The better answer is the “Helping Families Save Thier Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009.” Let’s get that bill passed!

Vountary modifications flow from judicial power to modify

The week the House was debating the judicial mortgage modification, lawyers on the other side of three of my cases volunteered their openess to a modification of the mortgage in question.  Unheard of!

Prior to this point, I had seen only one client who made any headway with a voluntary loan modification, and it eventually crashed when the lender imposed impossible and expensive conditions regarding the junior liens.

All of a sudden, the prospect that a judge might be able to approve a loan modification within the statutory guidelines seemed to have changed the lender’s world view.

Now I know that it may be just the continually worsening housing market that influenced the lenders in my cases.  But it seems to me symbolic of the benefit that leveling the playing field by allowing loan modification in Chapter 13 provides.

My mental image of the current loan mod alignment is that of a playground teter-toter where there is an adult on one end (the bank) and a five year old on the other (the borrower).  Not much parity.  Put a bankruptcy judge on the five year old’s end, and the borrower and the lender can play (or negotiate) effectively.

How long before the doubters in the U.S. Senate see this as a priority?  How many more houses lost to families before some imaginative thinking and real leadership emerges?

Senator rejects limitations on mortgage modification

Senator Schumer is quoted in Politico as rejecting a proposed compromise to S. 61 that would limit its scope to sub prime mortgages.  Bravo!

The apparent strategy of the bankers is to try to amend the mortgage modification bill into irrelevancy.  Schumer points out that such a limitation would dramatically reduce the positive effect of the bill on declining housing markets.

The clients I’m seeing in the past couple of weeks are looking at declines in housing values of several hundred thousand dollars each.  While there might have been a logic to trying to keep a house with a toxic mortgage when the house’s value equaled the debt, I can’t advise that it makes sense on current values.

Without the option of judicial modification, the lenders have no incentive to offer meaningful modifications.  It was telling that the week HR 1106 was up for a vote, I had three opposing attorneys raise the subject of their clients’ openness to modifying the mortgage principal.  First time in the course of this crisis that lenders expressed any real interest in keeping my clients in the house and paying on a modified mortgage.

Let’s hope that Schumer’s colleagues in the Senate hear from constituents other than bankers on this issue.  Email your Senators at www.nacba.org/TellCongress.

The Home Affordable Refinance Program

The Obama Administration’s new plan to help stabilize home prices allows qualified homeowners to refinance their first mortgage up to 105% of the value of their home and take advantage of historically low interest rates.

To qualify the property must be owner occupied, homeowners must have a solid payment history, and the existing mortgage must be owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.  To find out if your confoming loan qualifies visit Fannie Mae at www.fanniemae.com/homeaffordable and Freddie Mac at www.freddiemac.com/avoidforeclosure.

Having a second mortgage or line of credit does not disqualify a homeowner and only the first loan counts toward the 105%.  However, all junior lien holders must agree to subordinate to the new first mortgage and borrowers can not take cash out of the refinance to pay other debts.  Only transaction costs associated with the refinance may be included in the refinance amount.

Finally, if a borrower is delinquent in paying their mortgage they are not eligible for the refinancce option and should contact their loan servicer to see if they qualify for a Home Affordable Modification. The Modification option of the Obama plan will be discussed in an upcoming post.

Senate sends the Mortgage Modification Bill to Committee!

The Senate Banking Committee is now looking at the “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009.”  Even though the House passed this legislation two weeks ago, the Senate has decided it needs more information; more “debate.”

The Banking Committee now has control over the bill and will argue its merits in the next week (or two or six…).  This is silly.  The Banking Committee isn’t the right venue to deal with the pros and cons of this bill. It should go to the Senate Judiciary Committee, if it needs to be further scrutinized.

The Senate Judiciary Committee normally analyzes bills amending Title 11 of the US Code (the Bankruptcy Act).  They have the knowledge and expertise to do so.  The Banking Committee usually looks at legislation aimed at regulating banks, credit unions and the like: not at bankruptcy legislation.

Although this doesn’t mean the end of this legislation, it will, no doubt, slow down passage and complicate the process as the committee struggles to understand the issues and approve the bill for vote by the Senate.

Time for us all to write our Senators and get this moving again.

Debunking arguments against mortgage modification

Giving bankruptcy judges the same right to help families with underwater  home mortgages as investors now have will not create a flood of bankruptcy cases. Yet this is one of the arguments that opponents to S. 61 bandy about as a reason to kill the bill.

I see financially struggling families day in and day out about filing bankruptcy.  They would rather be anywhere but in my office.  Too often, they have let pride or irrational optimism keep them from exploring bankruptcy relief.  They are reluctant to even learn about bankruptcy, much less make the decision to file.

I counseled three different  new clients this week to stop paying on their credit cards as we prepared for bankruptcy.  All three were horrified;  two burst into tears at the thought of not paying what they owed.  The instinct and  the desire to pay what they owe is deep rooted in almost all consumers.  Those who predict a flood of casual, opportunistic bankruptcy filers if mortgage modification becomes possible simply haven’t talked to real people in debt lately.

If there is going to be a flood of bankruptcies, it is because families have exhausted every financial source they have to keep their home:   cash from credit cards; loans from 401(k); payday loans.  The list goes on.

The availability of a bankruptcy discharge doesn’t cause bankruptcy;  debt and despair cause bankruptcy.

How much better off would families be if bankruptcy could produce a real solution to the untenable home mortgage?  Right now, the prosperous can cram down the mortgage on the vacation home or the rental properties.  Why is the homeowner the only one barred from this relief?

Making Home Affordable: alternative to walking away

New  programs from the Obama Treasury Department will help borrowers refinance or modify their loans without bankruptcy. The plan even gives people options if their economic situation gets worse.

With housing prices falling fast around the country, the San Francisco Bay Area has not seen prices fall like this for decades, families everywhere are feeling the credit crunch. The Obama Administration’s program to make homes affordable again seeks to limit the amount people spend on their home to 31% of their gross income by allowing those who qualify to modify their loans.

The plan helps even those who want to refinance to take advantage of historically low interest rates, but can’t because they don’t have enough equity. Now those qualified can refinance even if they owe 105% of the value of their home on their first mortgage.

Below is a chart of the qualifications for the various options and the incentives provided by each.**

Program Option

Qualifications

Incentives

Loan Refinance

-The property must be owner occupied

-The borrower must have sufficient income to support the new mortgage debt

-The first mortgage may not exceed 105% of the current market value of the property

-The conforming loan must be owned or securitized by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

-Access to historically low interest rates otherwise unavailable because of steep decline in home prices.

-Reduced monthly payment that is more affordable now and in the future.

-Increased ability to pay down principal instead of paying interest at the previously higher rate.

Loan Modification

-The loan must secure an owner occupied property of 1 – 4 units

-An unpaid loan balance that is equal to or less than $729,750 for one unit, $934,200 for two units, $1,129,250 for 3 units, and $1,403,400 for 4 units.

-The Loan must have been originated before January 1, 2009

-The mortgage payment (including taxes, insurance, and homeowners association dues) is more than 31% of the borrowers’ gross monthly income

-The borrower has experienced a significant change in income or expenses, to the point that the current mortgage payment is no longer affordable

-Reduction of loan payment to approximately 31% of borrower’s gross monthly income, achieved by first reducing the interest rate, then extending the term of the loan, and finally principle reduction.

-Borrower incentives for timely payments on the modified loan up to $1,000 per year for the first five years.

-Servicer incentives, including $1,000 for each modification of a delinquent loan and $1,500 for modification of a current loan, and up to $1,000 per year for each year the borrower remains current on their payments, limited to the first 3 years.

-Investors receive a one time payment of $1,500 if they agree to modify a loan that is not delinquent as well as a subsidy for a portion of the cost to deduce the interest rate down to an affordable level.

Short Sale or Deed-in-Lieu

-Borrowers of the Loan Modification program who fail to qualify or go into default

-Borrowers whose property fails the Net Present Value test of the Loan Modification Program

-Borrowers are eligible for a payment of $1,500 in relocation expenses in order to effectuate these transactions

-Servicers are eligible for a $500 incentive and can make a reimbursable payment of up to $1,000 to extinguish other liens.

Bankruptcy Changes – if enacted***

-Debtors who qualify for Chapter 13 bankruptcy and own an unaffordable primary residence

-Judicial modification of the home loan, including reduction of interest rate and reduction of principal

This is only a summary and detailed information about each borrower is required to qualify for each of the program options. The precise details of the plan are available at www.FinancialStability.gov.

*** At the time of this posting, new bankruptcy legislation has passed one house of congress.

John L. Mlnarik,  an attorney in Santa Clara,California, authored this post. Contact him at john@mlnariklaw.com.

New mortgage tools without bankruptcy

The complete announcement of President Obama’s housing assistance programs not involving bankruptcy can be found at FinancialStability.gov.  The site offers a self assessment tool so you can determine if you are eligible for the programs for loan modification or for refinance.

We will have an overview of these programs here soon.

The success of these programs which depend on lender cooperation will be strongly influenced by whether borrowers have an alternative route to mortgage modification in Chapter 13.  The Senate is expected to take up the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act this coming week.

Mortgage Modification Bill Passes House

The House of Representatives passed the bill to allow mortgage modifications yesterday, March 5, 2009, by a vote of 234-191.

If the Bill passes the Senate and becomes law, Bankruptcy Judges will be allowed to modify mortgages to reduce interest rates, modify the amount of the secured portion of the loan and even extend payments. Judges will also have to weigh a homeowner’s income against the payments needed to pay the loan and determine what an appropriate interest rate and/or principal reduction should be under federally approved guidelines.

This is the “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009” with several changes.  Chief among them is a provision that requires home owners to seek a voluntary loan modification from their lender before the court can consider doing so.

The next step is to get a similar bill through the Senate and consolidate the two for signature by President Obama.  He has promised to sign such legislation both during his campaign and in recent comments concerning the foreclosure crisis.