Northern California Mortgage Mods Rotating Header Image

May, 2009:

Reduced to facilitating short sales?

The Obama administration has announced “enhancements” to its housing program that will make it easier for a homeowner to lose their home via short sale. Huh?

If this is part of a home retention program, I don’t get it.  A short sale nets no money for the seller.  It simply allows a buyer to get clear title to the property even when the existing lenders get less than they are owed.

The Obama program will also try to make it easier for homeowners to deed their properties to the lender without the necessity of a foreclosure.

It makes little difference to the former homeowner whether the mechanism of home loss is foreclosure, short sale, or deed in lieu.  The home is gone, and the family may be sliding out of the middle class.  I spend lots of time pointing out to those on the brink of losing their homes that living there payment free til the foreclosure may be the only return they will get on their investment.

The cynic in me wonders whether this program is simply another attempt to bolster the bankers, rather than the home owners.

The MHA’s Second Lien Program: Medicine for Modification Nightmares

If you have been dreaming about reducing the interest on your second mortgage down to 1% and extending the term out as far as your first loan, you can make your dreams a reality by applying for a modification or refinance from the Obama Administration.

Enhancements to the Making Home Affordable (“MHA”) plan announced in late April were made, at least in part, because of complications second mortgages presented banks when attempting to modify or refinance a first mortgage. The new provisions, along with the integration of the Hope for Homeowners program, will assist even underwater borrowers by requiring write downs in order to increase homeowner equity, or at least subdue the urge to simply walk away.

Details of the Making Home Affordable Program Update spell out what can be done for amortizing loans as well as interest-only loans.

Amortizing Loans: (Loans on which borrowers make principal as well as interest payments)  Participating servicers are required to take specific steps when modifying amortizing liens in the second position.

1) Interest rate reduction down to 1 %,

2) Extension of the term to that of the modified first mortgage,

3) Principal forbearance on the first lien, with the option of extinguishing principal under what the MHA plan calls the Extingueshment Schedule.

Of course there is a catch, there is always a catch,

4) After five years, the interest rate on the lien in the second position will adjust to the current interest rate on the first mortgage,

5) The lien in the second position will then re-amortize over the remaining term at the higher interest rate, and

6) Investors receive an incentive payment from the U.S. Treasury equal to one half of the difference between the 1% interest rate floor and the modified interest rate on the first lien.

Interest-Only Loans: (Loans on which borrowers make only interest payments) In the case of an interest only loan, servicers are to

1) Reduce the interest rate down to 2%,

2) Forbear principal in the same proportion as forbearance on the first lien,

3) Extinguish principal under the Extinguishment Schedule, if any,

4) After five years the interest rate steps up to the interest rate on the modified first mortgage,

5) The lien in the second position amortizes either over the remaining term of the modified first loan or the originally scheduled amortization term, which ever is longer, and amortization begins at the time specified in the original contract,

6) Investors receive an incentive payment from the U.S. Treasury equal to one half of the difference between the 2% interest rate floor and the modified interest rate on the first lien.

There are also a pay-for-success structure for the second lien program similar to the first lien modification program.  Servicers can be paid $500 up-front for a successful modification and borrowers can receive up to $250 per year for as many as 5 years.  Payments made to the borrower are applied to the principal due on the first mortgage.

To give an incentive to lenders for extinguishing a second mortgage the MHA second lien program provides for an Extinguishment Price Schedule. The Extinguishment Schedule ranges from $.04 to $.12 for every dollar of debt extinguished for loans that are less than 180 days past due at the time of modification.  For loans more than 180 days past due at the time of modification there is no schedule and the lender/investor is paid $.03 for every dollar of debt extinguished.

Thus far the Obama Administration’s solution has been one of financial bargaining with banks, servicers and investors.  The money that borrowers receive in these plans amount to a reduction in loan principle, which is only another payment to the bank.

Time will tell if these changes are effective or whether the borrowers eventually end up in bankruptcy or foreclosure.  Not to mention having the banks and GSEs converting to property managers! For anyone who owns an investment property and can attest to what a headache it is, maybe there will be some sort of justice after all?

Lobbyists against modification spend millions

In the first quarter of 09, the financial industry spent over $42 million dollars to defeat  mortgage modification in bankruptcy.  That doesn’t count what was spent in the month of April in an effort to avoid leveling the playing field on home loan modifications.

All of this money to preserve the right to lose a bunch of money foreclosing on houses that become less valuable with each foreclosure.  I’m sure this must make sense to someone….

What now, naysayers?

The Senate bill to allow Chapter 13 plans to modify home mortgages went down to defeat last week.  I am still waiting for those who couldn’t vote for this change in bankruptcy law to propose a solution to underwater homes, adjusting rate mortgages, and neighborhoods full of bank owned homes.

Have we rejected the “good” in quest for the “perfect”?  Have we knuckled to bank lobbying?  Are we just too stuck in old ways of thinking that we can’t explore bolder  alternatives?

I suspect my anger over this defeat will subside, but not soon as I face another week of appointments with people facing the loss of their homes.  My collection of options for them remains limited.

And I’ll wait, not so patiently, for the naysayers to propose their foreclosure fix.

Helping Families Save Homes defeated in the Senate

A modified version of the Helping Families Save Their Homes In Bankruptcy Act of 2009 went down to defeat on Thursday, April 30, 2009.  60 votes were needed to pass the legislation and only 45 Senators voted in favor.

This vision was appended by an amendment to a financial act with a number of provisions unrelated to bankruptcy or foreclosure.  Nonetheless, the best chance to see this legislation become law this year has probably just passed.

Bankruptcy judges will continue to have authority to modify almost any other kind of loan except those secured by a personal residence.  That still leaves Chapter 13 bankruptcy as one way to offer some relief to a family struggling to keep their home.  It may not be enough, and the Act would have made a huge difference and saved many homes.  Maybe next year…