Northern California Mortgage Mods Rotating Header Image

General

Mortgage trouble? Call your Congressman

MoneyNews.com reports on the efforts of two member of Congress to help consituents find help with  loan modification.   It’s telling that one representative made no headway until she called the chief executive officers of Wells Fargo and Bank of America.  Homeowners without that Congressional clout languish on hold listening to canned music and are shuffled from department to department.

A majority in the Senate rejected empowering banrkuptcy courts to effect mortgage modification.  Put in the best light, they apparently assume that the banks are motivated and capable of providing voluntary resolution of the mortgage crisis. [The alternative explanation came from Senator Dick Durbin: "The banks own this place (the Senate)".]

Having trouble resolving mortgage troubles with your lender?  Facing forecloure?  Call your representatives in Congress: enlist their help with keeping your home.

The MHA’s Second Lien Program: Medicine for Modification Nightmares

If you have been dreaming about reducing the interest on your second mortgage down to 1% and extending the term out as far as your first loan, you can make your dreams a reality by applying for a modification or refinance from the Obama Administration.

Enhancements to the Making Home Affordable (“MHA”) plan announced in late April were made, at least in part, because of complications second mortgages presented banks when attempting to modify or refinance a first mortgage. The new provisions, along with the integration of the Hope for Homeowners program, will assist even underwater borrowers by requiring write downs in order to increase homeowner equity, or at least subdue the urge to simply walk away.

Details of the Making Home Affordable Program Update spell out what can be done for amortizing loans as well as interest-only loans.

Amortizing Loans: (Loans on which borrowers make principal as well as interest payments)  Participating servicers are required to take specific steps when modifying amortizing liens in the second position.

1) Interest rate reduction down to 1 %,

2) Extension of the term to that of the modified first mortgage,

3) Principal forbearance on the first lien, with the option of extinguishing principal under what the MHA plan calls the Extingueshment Schedule.

Of course there is a catch, there is always a catch,

4) After five years, the interest rate on the lien in the second position will adjust to the current interest rate on the first mortgage,

5) The lien in the second position will then re-amortize over the remaining term at the higher interest rate, and

6) Investors receive an incentive payment from the U.S. Treasury equal to one half of the difference between the 1% interest rate floor and the modified interest rate on the first lien.

Interest-Only Loans: (Loans on which borrowers make only interest payments) In the case of an interest only loan, servicers are to

1) Reduce the interest rate down to 2%,

2) Forbear principal in the same proportion as forbearance on the first lien,

3) Extinguish principal under the Extinguishment Schedule, if any,

4) After five years the interest rate steps up to the interest rate on the modified first mortgage,

5) The lien in the second position amortizes either over the remaining term of the modified first loan or the originally scheduled amortization term, which ever is longer, and amortization begins at the time specified in the original contract,

6) Investors receive an incentive payment from the U.S. Treasury equal to one half of the difference between the 2% interest rate floor and the modified interest rate on the first lien.

There are also a pay-for-success structure for the second lien program similar to the first lien modification program.  Servicers can be paid $500 up-front for a successful modification and borrowers can receive up to $250 per year for as many as 5 years.  Payments made to the borrower are applied to the principal due on the first mortgage.

To give an incentive to lenders for extinguishing a second mortgage the MHA second lien program provides for an Extinguishment Price Schedule. The Extinguishment Schedule ranges from $.04 to $.12 for every dollar of debt extinguished for loans that are less than 180 days past due at the time of modification.  For loans more than 180 days past due at the time of modification there is no schedule and the lender/investor is paid $.03 for every dollar of debt extinguished.

Thus far the Obama Administration’s solution has been one of financial bargaining with banks, servicers and investors.  The money that borrowers receive in these plans amount to a reduction in loan principle, which is only another payment to the bank.

Time will tell if these changes are effective or whether the borrowers eventually end up in bankruptcy or foreclosure.  Not to mention having the banks and GSEs converting to property managers! For anyone who owns an investment property and can attest to what a headache it is, maybe there will be some sort of justice after all?

If My Mortgage Is Modified Will I Have To Pay Tax On The “Forgiven” Amount?

Generally, the IRS will assess a tax on debt you owed that was “forgiven.” This includes mortgage payments that have been modified or have been eliminated by short sale or foreclosure.

But in 2007, Congress passed the “Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007.”  That law says that should all or part of your first mortgage go away, you won’t have to pay tax on the amount that is gone.  This is the case for loans eliminated or reduced through foreclosure, short sale or modification.

There are limits on the regulation, however: it only applies to loans used to buy, build or improve a principal residence and only if the home is worth less than $1,000,000 (twice that for a couple filing jointly).

Additionally, the act was set to expire this year but has been extended through 2012.

Who Needs A Mortgage Modification?

Mortgage modifications save homes.  They allow honest, hard working families to keep their houses.

The foreclosure crisis is all around us. Too many families are losing their homes because they can’t afford to keep making the payments.  These families are struggling primarily because of a couple of different factors: either they have a catastrophic event occur such as the loss of a job or a medical expense that insurance doesn’t completely cover; or they can’t refinance their variable mortgage because the banks have stopped lending money and there’s no equity in the house.

Consider the plight of Ms. A. At age 75 she was conned into refinancing her home to pay off a couple of credit cards.  She is living on a fixed income and now that the adjustable rate on her mortgage has raised her payments from $500 a month (interest only) to $1500 a month, she can’t make the payments.  And she can’t refinance because the loan company that assured her she would be able to do so, is refusing.  Her house has declined in value and neither the equity she has nor her retirement income can justify anyone lending her money.  She needs a loan modification.

Or consider Mr. and Mrs. L.  They had a thriving business, cleaning office buildings.  So, they bought their dream house, having plenty of saved money for the down payment and enough steady income to easily make the monthly payment.  But the business is now failing due to the economy, and the house isn’t worth what they paid for it, or even what they owe against it.  They need a loan modification.

Finally, consider the plight of Mr. and Mrs. G.  He just got word that the factory he has worked for the past twenty years is closing and his 6 digit supervisor position is a thing of the past. Oh, he’ll get unemployment insurance for a while but that won’t replace his salary and won’t cover the household expenses.  And the housing market is such that his house, which he has lived in for 15 years, making every payment, isn’t worth the money he owes against it. This family needs a modification.

Waiting for the banks and loan companies to help isn’t working.  We need a judge to mediate the process and help lenders and home owners reach a compromise that will allow mortgage companies to get paid and families to keep their homes.

Mortgage Modification Companies: Scams or Saviors?

New companies have sprung up to help homeowners save their homes from foreclosures by working out a modification.  This seems to be a growth industry here in Northern California, where foreclosures have been high.  

The problem is some of these “services” are simple scam artists trying to make a quick buck by preying on the unfortunate home-owner struggling to keep her home in this economy.  

How do you know who to trust?  There are a couple of basic rules to follow when seeking this kind of help.

1. First, check out the company.  Have they been around for more than a week?  Are the owners and managers trained professionals in the real estate or legal community?  Do they have a bad track record with the local Better Business Bureau or the California Department of Consumer Affairs?

2. Make sure that whoever you are speaking with is more interested in learning about your loan and the financing of your house, than how you are going to come up with the money to pay them.

3. Get some deadlines. These kinds of modifications take time, certainly, but a reputable company should be able to give you some specific periods of action.  

4. Follow your instincts.  If the salesperson is telling you what seems too good to be true, it probably is – find another company.

Modifications are out there.  They can turn around a nasty loan or difficult situation, but you need to be careful not to throw a couple of thousand dollars away on a “here today; gone tomorrow” company.  

The better answer is the “Helping Families Save Thier Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009.” Let’s get that bill passed!

The Problem With Leaving Modification Up To The Lenders: A Case Study

A couple of months ago, a retired woman contacted me about her home loan. It seems she had been hood-winked into getting a refinance to pay some unsecured bills that left her unable to reasonably make her monthly mortgage payments.  I told her to get me the documents so I could determine the best course of action to undo the damage and save her home.  At the time she wasn’t in foreclosure, but was behind a couple of months.

Since a foreclosure hadn’t started, it seemed the best thing to do was to try and help her get a loan modification.  Maybe the lender would see the errors of the broker who put the refinance together and be cooperative.   (more…)

Modifying the Mortgage

The “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009” (the Act) will allow a Bankruptcy judge to modify the existing mortgage.  Although the details of how this will work will need to be ironed out after the bill passes, the basic concepts are not alien to bankruptcy judges or lawyers.

For years the courts have had the power to modify loans on property that is not the debtor’s principal residence.  No doubt the new law will work similarly.

Specifically, the Act will allow a Bankruptcy Judge to reduce the secured amount of the loan to the fair market value of the home.  Thus, if the house is only worth $250,000 but the debt is $300,000 the judge can reduce the secured portion to $250,000 and the debtor can treat the other $50,000 as wholly unsecured.   A debtor in a chapter 13 plan pays only a portion of her unsecured debts depending on several factors.  A likely scenario is that the debtor may only have to pay 5 to 10% of that $50,000.

Additionally, the Act will allow a judge to dictate a reasonable interest rate for the loan.  He will also be able to extend the term of the loan to 40 years from the normal 30. Both of these provisions will dramatically and substantially reduce the monthly payment amount.

All in all, the Act will save thousands, if not millions, of homeowners from losing their houses to foreclosure.

Is The “Clawback” Amendment To HR 200 Fair?

HR 200, the house version of the “Helping Families Save Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009” was amended in committee to include a “clawback” amendment.  This allows the mortgage companies, whose loans are modified by a bankruptcy judge, to share in the appreciation of a house that is later sold by the home owner.  The benefit to the lender will go from 80% of any appreciation in the house’s value during the first year after modification to 20% in the 4th year.  Thus the lender, whose loan exceeded the value of the property when modified by the bankruptcy court, will get a wind-fall if the house appreciates and the home-owner sells it.  Is this fair?

Without the modification by a bankruptcy judge, the lender would end up with the house in foreclosure.  Generally that means that the lender, on average, will end up with about 50% of their loan.  With the modification, they rate to get 75% of the loan amount; so is it fair that they end up with 75% and a chunk of the appreciation?

Certainly, giving the lender a large chunk of a home’s appreciation is a disincentive to the homeowner to improve the house.  Would you spend $15,000 on a new roof to enhance the value of your property knowing that the mortgage company is going to get 80% (or even 20%) of that additional value?

Like all dramatic changes to existing law, the devil is in the details.  Just how this is going to work is not an easy problem.  One thing is certain: homeowners need this legislation to save their homes, but it has to be a workable, reasonable solution.

House Bill 200, With Amendments, Approved By Committee And Sent To House Floor

The , “Helping Families Save Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009” was approved by the House Judiciary Committee, voting strictly on party lines, and sent to the House Floor late on January 28, 2009.

The committee added several amendments to the bill. Several of these are discussed in the post, “Changes to HR 200 as Reported from Committee.”

But, an additional change was added as well, making the act inapplicable to anyone who obtained their home loan by “…misrepresentation, false premises, or actual fraud.” This amendment was presented simply to insure that the bill, intended to help normal, hard working; families can’t be used for the benefit of crooks trying to take advantage of the system.

Now is the time to contact your Congressperson. The vote will be soon (hopefully).

The Banking and Lending Industry is Fighting Hard against the Mortgage Modification Bill

Opposition to the “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy act of 2009” is coming from the banking and lending industry.  They are literally pouring millions of dollars into lobbying against this legislation, as reported by KUTV, news 2.

They argue that allowing judges to reduce mortgage payments will end up costing home owners more in the long run, because mortgage lenders will have to charge higher interest rates and require more of a down payment to offset the risk that the loan amount could be reduced by a bankruptcy judge.   

This industry has spent millions on lobbying efforts in the past year.  The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, alone, spent $57.9 million on lobbying in 2008, and is one of the ten organizations that is actively opposing this legislation in Congress.  

It’s time to get this bill passed.  It is the one thing that could save your home.  Write, fax or e-mail your Congressperson.