Northern California Mortgage Mods Rotating Header Image

News

Mortgage Modifications Just Got Tougher

New legislation introduced, allegedly at the request of California Governor, Schwarzenegger, will make it tougher to get a mortgage modification.  This legislation, California Senate Bill 94, includes language that says that attorneys can’t be paid for helping a homeowner apply for a modification until the process is completed!

Frankly, attorneys aren’t used to working that way.  They’re used to being paid for the work they do as it is done; not afterwards.  Most attorneys, facing several hours of work, request a retainer from the client in order to insure that the costs and fees incurred get paid.

A standard modification can take three to six months to complete.  During that time the attorney is working hard on the matter, has to pay his staff, his office rent, his expenses, and his mortgage!  Forcing him to wait until the process is over is asking him to lend money to the client.

Not only is this bad business for the attorney, it immediately creates a conflict with the client.  Now, the attorney is forced to get a modification (else he won’t be paid), rather than give the client his best advice which might be to walk away from the house or file bankruptcy if the lender won’t offer a workable solution.

All in all, if this becomes law, I think you’ll see an immediate drop in the number to attorneys willing to attempt a mortgage modification.

Refinancing Limits Raised: Happy 4th of July!

Remember when you were a kid and the simplest things intrigued you? When you parroted the reaction of those around you because you were learning how to react to something new, something you had never seen or experienced before.

That is how a lot of American’s must have felt when the most recent expansion to the Making Home Affordable Plan was announced on July 1st.  For an explanation of the Home Affordable Refinance Program otherwise known as HARP see my previous post.

Now borrowers, who have loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, can refinance up to 125%  of their home’s value.  Sure this will allow more American’s to qualify for a refinance under the plan, but if you are one of those who now qualify you’ve got to be asking yourself, “Do I really want to do this?”

Well do you? Do you really want to refinance your house when the loan to value ratio is over 105%?  That is what the government would like you to do, and now those who are between 106% and 125% loan to value can do it too!

Forgive me if I feel like a kid again.  Like a kid who just saw fireworks for the first time and can’t figure out if it is great or just, as my grandfather used to tell me, “Like burning money”.

Don’t get me wrong, I like fireworks and fanfare just as much as every other red blooded American.  But who among us enjoys being told something will help when in reality doing that very thing is not in our best interest?  I don’t know about you, but I like it even less when I find out later that those who it is really helping are those among us need help the very least.

So, light your fireworks this 4th of July and burn a little money to celebrat our independence.  But before you exercise your freedom to light the big fat stick of dynamite the government just put in your hands, think about the first time you held a firecrecker too long and how your fingers felt.  Oh and don’t forget to multiply that feeling by 125.

New California Law Extends Time Periods For Foreclosures

An additional 90 days has been added, is some cases, to the length of time for a homeowner to cure a default in mortgage payments. The California Foreclosure Prevention Act went into effect on June 15, 2009. This bill extends the current 90 day period between notice of default and notice of sale to 180 days.

Unfortunately, the law is limited in its application to a principal residence occupied by the borrower at the time of the default and only if the loan is the first lien against the residence and was recorded between January 1, 2003 and January 1, 2008.

A mortgage loan servicer can apply to the California Real Estate Commissioner for an exemption to this law (reducing the time period for cure back to 90 days) if they have implemented a loan modification program with specified features. Once the Real Estate Commissioner concludes that the program meets the necessary requirements, the mortgage loan servicer will receive a permanent exemption.

What this means for homeowners is that, under the above circumstances, and if the holder of their first deed of trust hasn’t received an exemption, the homeowner has 6 months from the notice of default to modify the loan, refinance, sell the home or otherwise cure the default.

The MHA’s Second Lien Program: Medicine for Modification Nightmares

If you have been dreaming about reducing the interest on your second mortgage down to 1% and extending the term out as far as your first loan, you can make your dreams a reality by applying for a modification or refinance from the Obama Administration.

Enhancements to the Making Home Affordable (“MHA”) plan announced in late April were made, at least in part, because of complications second mortgages presented banks when attempting to modify or refinance a first mortgage. The new provisions, along with the integration of the Hope for Homeowners program, will assist even underwater borrowers by requiring write downs in order to increase homeowner equity, or at least subdue the urge to simply walk away.

Details of the Making Home Affordable Program Update spell out what can be done for amortizing loans as well as interest-only loans.

Amortizing Loans: (Loans on which borrowers make principal as well as interest payments)  Participating servicers are required to take specific steps when modifying amortizing liens in the second position.

1) Interest rate reduction down to 1 %,

2) Extension of the term to that of the modified first mortgage,

3) Principal forbearance on the first lien, with the option of extinguishing principal under what the MHA plan calls the Extingueshment Schedule.

Of course there is a catch, there is always a catch,

4) After five years, the interest rate on the lien in the second position will adjust to the current interest rate on the first mortgage,

5) The lien in the second position will then re-amortize over the remaining term at the higher interest rate, and

6) Investors receive an incentive payment from the U.S. Treasury equal to one half of the difference between the 1% interest rate floor and the modified interest rate on the first lien.

Interest-Only Loans: (Loans on which borrowers make only interest payments) In the case of an interest only loan, servicers are to

1) Reduce the interest rate down to 2%,

2) Forbear principal in the same proportion as forbearance on the first lien,

3) Extinguish principal under the Extinguishment Schedule, if any,

4) After five years the interest rate steps up to the interest rate on the modified first mortgage,

5) The lien in the second position amortizes either over the remaining term of the modified first loan or the originally scheduled amortization term, which ever is longer, and amortization begins at the time specified in the original contract,

6) Investors receive an incentive payment from the U.S. Treasury equal to one half of the difference between the 2% interest rate floor and the modified interest rate on the first lien.

There are also a pay-for-success structure for the second lien program similar to the first lien modification program.  Servicers can be paid $500 up-front for a successful modification and borrowers can receive up to $250 per year for as many as 5 years.  Payments made to the borrower are applied to the principal due on the first mortgage.

To give an incentive to lenders for extinguishing a second mortgage the MHA second lien program provides for an Extinguishment Price Schedule. The Extinguishment Schedule ranges from $.04 to $.12 for every dollar of debt extinguished for loans that are less than 180 days past due at the time of modification.  For loans more than 180 days past due at the time of modification there is no schedule and the lender/investor is paid $.03 for every dollar of debt extinguished.

Thus far the Obama Administration’s solution has been one of financial bargaining with banks, servicers and investors.  The money that borrowers receive in these plans amount to a reduction in loan principle, which is only another payment to the bank.

Time will tell if these changes are effective or whether the borrowers eventually end up in bankruptcy or foreclosure.  Not to mention having the banks and GSEs converting to property managers! For anyone who owns an investment property and can attest to what a headache it is, maybe there will be some sort of justice after all?

Helping Families Save Homes defeated in the Senate

A modified version of the Helping Families Save Their Homes In Bankruptcy Act of 2009 went down to defeat on Thursday, April 30, 2009.  60 votes were needed to pass the legislation and only 45 Senators voted in favor.

This vision was appended by an amendment to a financial act with a number of provisions unrelated to bankruptcy or foreclosure.  Nonetheless, the best chance to see this legislation become law this year has probably just passed.

Bankruptcy judges will continue to have authority to modify almost any other kind of loan except those secured by a personal residence.  That still leaves Chapter 13 bankruptcy as one way to offer some relief to a family struggling to keep their home.  It may not be enough, and the Act would have made a huge difference and saved many homes.  Maybe next year…

Vote on Modification May be This Week

A group of Senate Democrats, apparently opposed to passage of the “Helping Families Save their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009,” are likely to push the bill to a vote this week on the Senate floor.

This is, unfortunately, bad news for those of us hoping to give bankruptcy judges the power to work out mortgage modifications and save homes.  There aren’t enough votes to pass the measure, by most accounts, and therefore pushing it to a vote will likely mean defeat.

There is talk of rewriting the bill to build a better consensus and get something passed to stem the foreclosure crisis.  We will just have to wait and see what those changes are, and hope the act continues to include a real solution such as granting authority to Bankruptcy judges to modify loans.

Foreclosure Discussion in Chico on April 30

A discussion of foreclosures and possible alternatives will take place at the Chico Council Chambers on Thursday evening, April 30 at 6:00 pm.  This is a free event open to anyone interested.

The program is being sponsored by the Butte County Bar Association and Legal Services of Northern California.

A panel of three professionals, knowledgeable about foreclosures will lead the discussion.  present will be Greg Woods, foreclosure officer with Mid-Valley Title Company, Les Lobos, foreclosure specialist with Chico Housing and Credit Counseling Center and Douglas B. Jacobs, bankruptcy attorney.

Anyone concerned about keeping their home or about foreclosure rights and remedies is encouraged to attend.

Incentives We Have: Motivation We NEED!

Yesterday the Obama Administration released the names of 6 mortgage companies participating in its Making Home Affordable.  Today it was announced that the number of American households threatened with losing their homes grew 24%.

While the Administration’s plan provides incentives to those involved in a refinance, modification, short sale or deed in lieu, it has to be clear to the American public that the plan is worth little absent a real motivating factor.

Don’t get me wrong, the Washington think-tank that came up with the plan did a fantastic job structuring a solution to the problem they were given.  But the crux of the plan’s success depends on our elected officials in Washington passing legislation making it possible for a bankruptcy judge to modify a debtor’s loan in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.

Without the threat of a cram down ,a bank’s corporate executives have little choice but to do their duty, and make decisions based on what is best for their company.  Until the possibility of a cram down in bankruptcy becomes reality, things are going to need to get a lot worse before banks stop taking government hand outs and start making loan modifications that aren’t just for show.

Make no mistake, things will get better.  If you have any doubt read Chuck Lorre Production’s Vanity Card #248.   It is one of my favorites.

Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Lift Moratorium on Foreclosures

Several months ago, Freddie Mac and Fannie stopped foreclosing on residential property. They stated, at that time, that the ban on foreclosures was being done to help families over the holidays.

Well, I guess it’s not the holidays anymore, because they have quietly ended their ban and are beginning to send notices of default and sale where applicable.

In a brief statement, Fannie Mae spokesman, Brian Faith said that they will take into account the “Making Home Affordable” program which says that a foreclosure can only occur on a Fannie Mae loan if the loan servicer has determined that the home owner is ineligible for an affordable modification.  Unfortunately, such determination is in the hands of the lender or servicing company and not where it needs to be: held by someone impartial like a bankruptcy judge.

The Home Affordable Refinance Program

The Obama Administration’s new plan to help stabilize home prices allows qualified homeowners to refinance their first mortgage up to 105% of the value of their home and take advantage of historically low interest rates.

To qualify the property must be owner occupied, homeowners must have a solid payment history, and the existing mortgage must be owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.  To find out if your confoming loan qualifies visit Fannie Mae at www.fanniemae.com/homeaffordable and Freddie Mac at www.freddiemac.com/avoidforeclosure.

Having a second mortgage or line of credit does not disqualify a homeowner and only the first loan counts toward the 105%.  However, all junior lien holders must agree to subordinate to the new first mortgage and borrowers can not take cash out of the refinance to pay other debts.  Only transaction costs associated with the refinance may be included in the refinance amount.

Finally, if a borrower is delinquent in paying their mortgage they are not eligible for the refinancce option and should contact their loan servicer to see if they qualify for a Home Affordable Modification. The Modification option of the Obama plan will be discussed in an upcoming post.