Northern California Mortgage Mods Rotating Header Image

News

Foreclosures in California Drop 31.5%

Completed foreclosures in California dropped 31.5 percent from December to January, according to a report Wednesday in the San Francisco Business Times.

 14,351 foreclosures were completed in January, compared with 20,952 in December. The state still had more foreclosures than any other state, however.

California also ranks second in pre-foreclosure filings, which dropped to 33,008 in January from 41,710 in December. 

Industry leaders (largely the mortgage companies) attribute this drop to voluntary modifications and a sign that maybe the economy is turning around.  I think that’s wishful thinking and the drop has more to do with the voluntary moratoriums on foreclosures from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and now JPMorgan and Citigroup.

We still need the “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009.”

Lenders Stop Foreclosures

JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. are halting foreclosures for owner occupied homes.  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had done much the same thing at the end of last year, but lifted their moratorium in early January.  JPMorgan and Citigroup may be the first privately owned companies to stop foreclosing until the administration has a chance to do something constructive about the housing crisis.

Unfortunately, as my colleague, Cathy Moran noted, in her recent post, Moratorium on Foreclosures, this may be only a short lived attempt while the government looks at buying up tainted mortgages.  That isn’t going to help.

We need a long term solution to this crisis, not just a couple of months of relief for those lucky enough to be included in this foreclosure stoppage.  But you can bet that even if the foreclosure is stopped, the loan obligation continues to build.  Then the homeowner will be further behind with no solution.

The lenders should get behind the “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009” which will offer a permanent solution fair to both the homeowner and the mortgage company.

The Stimulus Package, Without A Fix For Foreclosures, Is Edging Closer To Passage.

CNN reported this morning that the Senate worked on a Saturday to reach a compromise on President Obama’s stimulus package.  As originally written the package contained a foreclosure fix: letting bankruptcy judges modify mortgages.  Today’s package lives on without any help at all for a family about to lose their home.

But, if the stimulus package does pass, the next thing on the Senate’s agenda is supposed to be the “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009.”  Hopefully that will be soon. 

Most objective observers see the housing crash and foreclosure mess as a leading factor in the economy’s woes. One would think, therefore, that some form of foreclosure relief would be first on the agenda; not second.  But, I guess that’s not the way our government sees things, and those of us committed to helping people stay in their homes look for other alternatives and keep our fingers crossed for passage of this bill.  

The U.S. Census Bureau Reports That a Record 19 Million Homes Were Vacant at the End of 2008

The foreclosure rate is skyrocketing!  According to Bloomberg News, there were nineteen million homes seized in 2008!  The largest increase came in the fourth quarter of the year when there was an increase of 6.7 percent over the 4th quarter in 2007.

The vacancy rate, the share of empty homes for sale, rose to 2.9 percent in that  quarter, the highest percentage of all years according to data going back to 1956. The report also indicated that about a third of owners whose home values drop 20 percent or more below their loan principal will “hand the keys back to the bank.”

Giving Bankruptcy Judges the power to fix this and keep people in their homes needs to be the government’s highest priority.

House Bill 200, With Amendments, Approved By Committee And Sent To House Floor

The , “Helping Families Save Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2009” was approved by the House Judiciary Committee, voting strictly on party lines, and sent to the House Floor late on January 28, 2009.

The committee added several amendments to the bill. Several of these are discussed in the post, “Changes to HR 200 as Reported from Committee.”

But, an additional change was added as well, making the act inapplicable to anyone who obtained their home loan by “…misrepresentation, false premises, or actual fraud.” This amendment was presented simply to insure that the bill, intended to help normal, hard working; families can’t be used for the benefit of crooks trying to take advantage of the system.

Now is the time to contact your Congressperson. The vote will be soon (hopefully).

Crack in the bank wall

JP Morgan Securities analysts have admitted that mortgage modification in bankruptcy may be a ” necessary evil” to stabilize  home values.

It ought to become harder for the banking industry to maintain that passage of a bankruptcy cram down bill will increase mortgage rates going forward, as the bill voted out of committee yesterday will apply only to loans in existence when the bill becomes effective.

Credit Suisse estimates that adding mortgage modification to the arsenal of bankruptcy judges might reduce the number of foreclosures by 20%.

Have you contacted your Congressman yet on this issue?  Find your represenatives in Washington and speak out in favor of mortgage modification.

Changes to HR 200 as reported from committee

The House Judiciary Committee today reported the bill to enable mortgage modification in bankruptcy to the full House after addition of a “claw back” provision.  The added provision provides for a declining percentage of net sales proceeds to be paid to the crammed down lender if the house is sold during the pendency of the bankruptcy for more than the modified loan amount.

The added provision for sharing of post bankruptcy appreciation gives the afffected lender 80% of the appreciation from a sale in the first year from the effective date of the plan; 60% in the 2nd year; 40% in the 3rd year; and 20% in the 4th year.

Also added to the bill was a provision that the debtor must seek a mortgage modification directly from the lender at least 15 days before proposing a plan that modifies a mortgage.  The lender presumably has an opportunity to negotiate a modification on its own terms before the bankruptcy court can impose a modification.

The last word from the banking industry was adamant opposition to judicial mortgage modification.  Industry lobbyists did not, as far as I could tell, propose an alternative that might actually stop the foreclosure tsunami.

House Judiciary to Meet and Vote Today

The National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys reports that:

The House Judiciary Committee will meet at 1 p.m. ET today to mark up (consider) HR 200, the “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act.”  At the time of the mark up there will be a manager’s amendment offered by Chairman Conyers that will embody the language changes agreed to in the Citigroup discussions and I expect there will be a few other changes as well.
You may watch a webcast of the mark up by going to:
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/caltoday.html.
The bill is expected to pass by a narrow margin; we don’t expect there will be any Republican votes in favor and we expect there may be a Democrat or two who opposes.
If you live in districts represented by any of the following Members, please call them THIS MORNING in support of H.R. 200 (phone numbers may be found at www.house.gov)
•    Daniel B. “Dan” Maffei (D-NY)
•    Robert Wexler (D-FL)
•    Brad Sherman (D-CA)
•    Adam B. Schiff (D-CA)
•    Charles A. Gonzalez (D-TX)
•    Pedro Pierluisi (D-PR)
Other Members of the Committee include:
•    John Conyers (D-MI) Chairman
•    Howard L. Berman (D-CA)
•    Rick Boucher (D-VA)
•    Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)
•    Robert C. “Bobby” Scott (D-VA)
•    Melvin L. Watt (D-NC)
•    Zoe Lofgren (D-CA)
•    Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX)
•    Maxine Waters (D-CA)
•    William D. Delahunt (D-MA)
•    Steve Cohen (D-TN)
•    Henry C. “Hank” Johnson (D-GA)
•    Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL)
•    Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)
•    Anthony D. Weiner (D-NY)
•    Linda T. Sánchez (D-CA)
•    Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL)

Bankruptcy Judges Support Mortgage Modification

The National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges has come out in favor of the “Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy act of 2009.”  This isn’t really very surprising – the bill will give the judges the discretion to modify a house payment and save countless homes from foreclosure.  At the same time, it will allow more people to succeed in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.  

What is newsworthy, however, is that the Judges wrote a letter to Senator Durbin and Congressman Connors, authors of the bills pending in their respective branches of Congress.  The letter asks that the language of the act be clarified in several areas before it becomes law.

The judges want to try and avoid a long series of lawsuits interpreting the new act should it pass. By fixing the language before it leaves Congress, confusion and ambiguity can be avoided.  

No doubt, the judges want to avoid the confusion of interpretation surrounding BAPCA, the new Bankruptcy act that went into effect in October 2005.  That piece of legislation is inundated with ambiguous, contradictory and confusing language.  Wouldn’t it be nice to avoid that kind of thing by allowing the judges who will need to implement this new law help in structuring it?