Northern California Mortgage Mods

New California Law Extends Time Periods For Foreclosures

An additional 90 days has been added, is some cases, to the length of time for a homeowner to cure a default in mortgage payments. The California Foreclosure Prevention Act went into effect on June 15, 2009. This bill extends the current 90 day period between notice of default and notice of sale to 180 days.

Unfortunately, the law is limited in its application to a principal residence occupied by the borrower at the time of the default and only if the loan is the first lien against the residence and was recorded between January 1, 2003 and January 1, 2008.

A mortgage loan servicer can apply to the California Real Estate Commissioner for an exemption to this law (reducing the time period for cure back to 90 days) if they have implemented a loan modification program with specified features. Once the Real Estate Commissioner concludes that the program meets the necessary requirements, the mortgage loan servicer will receive a permanent exemption.

What this means for homeowners is that, under the above circumstances, and if the holder of their first deed of trust hasn’t received an exemption, the homeowner has 6 months from the notice of default to modify the loan, refinance, sell the home or otherwise cure the default.

Mortgage Modification: What’s the Hold-Up?

Borrowers have reportedly been on the phone for a countless number of hours waiting to talk to someone about refinancing or modifying their home loans.  So, what’s the hold-up?

Have the banks not staffed their modification programs with enough people?  Are they simply using the Obama Administration’s plan as some kind of collection tactic to squeeze homeowners afraid of foreclosure?

While no one knows for sure what is causing the long wait times, experts in the area have come up with logical explanations and the American Bar Association released a free web seminar earlier this month discussing these issues and how the real estate crisis developed.

The 60 minute pod cast features Jamie Lathrop, Marc S. Stern and O. Max Gardner, III who all agree that without a motivating factor banks will continue to drag their feet.  O. Max Gardner, III calls modification in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy the hammer that is missing from the Obama Plan.  Having failed to pass the Senate earlier this year, Max predicts that a bankruptcy modification bill will be before Congress again by September.

The threat of foreclosing and having to write down their balance sheet should motivate banks, but as pointed out in the seminar, servicers have an incentive to allow a troubled property to sit on their balance sheet as it collects penalties and fees.  After all, when the property is foreclosed on, the servicer or a related third party will be paid for liquidating the troubled asset while the investor and the homeowner take the hit.

O. Max Gardner, III compared the securitization of mortgage loans to an expanded mortgage flipping scheme, pointing out that those borrowers with ARM loans are forced, by a scheduled increase in their interest rate, to refinance and again pay fees associated with doing so.

The experts also discussed limitations placed on servicers by the pooling and service agreements they have with investors.  Some of these agreements do not allow for any modifications and others only allow for a handful.

While it may not be entirely clear what is taking so long, it is clear that things are unlikely to change until a new kind of motivation presents itself.

Share your loan modification experience

Between the Obama plan and the loan modification ads on TV, you’d assume that everyone who need a loan modification can get one.  Is that your experience?

If you’ve tried to get a mortgage modification in the past three months, please share your experience with us.  Were you offered a modification?  What were the terms?  Did it reduce the amount you owed?  Were there conditions on qualifying?  Did you have to pay money in the process?

If you were unsuccessful, what prevented a modification?  Were you facing foreclosure?   Did the foreclosure go forward anyway?  Were you treated politely?  Knowledgeably?

Please report your experiences as a comment to this blog.

Mortgage trouble? Call your Congressman

MoneyNews.com reports on the efforts of two member of Congress to help consituents find help with  loan modification.   It’s telling that one representative made no headway until she called the chief executive officers of Wells Fargo and Bank of America.  Homeowners without that Congressional clout languish on hold listening to canned music and are shuffled from department to department.

A majority in the Senate rejected empowering banrkuptcy courts to effect mortgage modification.  Put in the best light, they apparently assume that the banks are motivated and capable of providing voluntary resolution of the mortgage crisis. [The alternative explanation came from Senator Dick Durbin: "The banks own this place (the Senate)".]

Having trouble resolving mortgage troubles with your lender?  Facing forecloure?  Call your representatives in Congress: enlist their help with keeping your home.

Fatigue in the war on foreclosure

The Mercury News’ story on community resources in the South Bay for those facing foreclosure was wrapped in the tale of a woman worn out by two years of counseling those at risk of losing their homes.

Congress and, to some degree the press, has moved on from the foreclosure crisis, while the statistics report that something like 12% of the home mortgages in the US are behind at least one payment.  Those in the trenches know that there seems no end in sight and voluntary loan modification programs aren’t in place or yet effective.

Bay Area organizations offering free assistance to those facing foreclosure include:

  • Project Sentinel  408 720 9888 press 3
  • Neighborhood Housing Services   408 279 2600
  • SurePath Financial Services  1 800 540 2227
  • EPA Can Do  650 473 9838
  • San Jose Foreclosure Help Center  408 794 1241

If you know of other free services, please add your comments.

Reduced to facilitating short sales?

The Obama administration has announced “enhancements” to its housing program that will make it easier for a homeowner to lose their home via short sale. Huh?

If this is part of a home retention program, I don’t get it.  A short sale nets no money for the seller.  It simply allows a buyer to get clear title to the property even when the existing lenders get less than they are owed.

The Obama program will also try to make it easier for homeowners to deed their properties to the lender without the necessity of a foreclosure.

It makes little difference to the former homeowner whether the mechanism of home loss is foreclosure, short sale, or deed in lieu.  The home is gone, and the family may be sliding out of the middle class.  I spend lots of time pointing out to those on the brink of losing their homes that living there payment free til the foreclosure may be the only return they will get on their investment.

The cynic in me wonders whether this program is simply another attempt to bolster the bankers, rather than the home owners.

The MHA’s Second Lien Program: Medicine for Modification Nightmares

If you have been dreaming about reducing the interest on your second mortgage down to 1% and extending the term out as far as your first loan, you can make your dreams a reality by applying for a modification or refinance from the Obama Administration.

Enhancements to the Making Home Affordable (”MHA”) plan announced in late April were made, at least in part, because of complications second mortgages presented banks when attempting to modify or refinance a first mortgage. The new provisions, along with the integration of the Hope for Homeowners program, will assist even underwater borrowers by requiring write downs in order to increase homeowner equity, or at least subdue the urge to simply walk away.

Details of the Making Home Affordable Program Update spell out what can be done for amortizing loans as well as interest-only loans.

Amortizing Loans: (Loans on which borrowers make principal as well as interest payments)  Participating servicers are required to take specific steps when modifying amortizing liens in the second position.

1) Interest rate reduction down to 1 %,

2) Extension of the term to that of the modified first mortgage,

3) Principal forbearance on the first lien, with the option of extinguishing principal under what the MHA plan calls the Extingueshment Schedule.

Of course there is a catch, there is always a catch,

4) After five years, the interest rate on the lien in the second position will adjust to the current interest rate on the first mortgage,

5) The lien in the second position will then re-amortize over the remaining term at the higher interest rate, and

6) Investors receive an incentive payment from the U.S. Treasury equal to one half of the difference between the 1% interest rate floor and the modified interest rate on the first lien.

Interest-Only Loans: (Loans on which borrowers make only interest payments) In the case of an interest only loan, servicers are to

1) Reduce the interest rate down to 2%,

2) Forbear principal in the same proportion as forbearance on the first lien,

3) Extinguish principal under the Extinguishment Schedule, if any,

4) After five years the interest rate steps up to the interest rate on the modified first mortgage,

5) The lien in the second position amortizes either over the remaining term of the modified first loan or the originally scheduled amortization term, which ever is longer, and amortization begins at the time specified in the original contract,

6) Investors receive an incentive payment from the U.S. Treasury equal to one half of the difference between the 2% interest rate floor and the modified interest rate on the first lien.

There are also a pay-for-success structure for the second lien program similar to the first lien modification program.  Servicers can be paid $500 up-front for a successful modification and borrowers can receive up to $250 per year for as many as 5 years.  Payments made to the borrower are applied to the principal due on the first mortgage.

To give an incentive to lenders for extinguishing a second mortgage the MHA second lien program provides for an Extinguishment Price Schedule. The Extinguishment Schedule ranges from $.04 to $.12 for every dollar of debt extinguished for loans that are less than 180 days past due at the time of modification.  For loans more than 180 days past due at the time of modification there is no schedule and the lender/investor is paid $.03 for every dollar of debt extinguished.

Thus far the Obama Administration’s solution has been one of financial bargaining with banks, servicers and investors.  The money that borrowers receive in these plans amount to a reduction in loan principle, which is only another payment to the bank.

Time will tell if these changes are effective or whether the borrowers eventually end up in bankruptcy or foreclosure.  Not to mention having the banks and GSEs converting to property managers! For anyone who owns an investment property and can attest to what a headache it is, maybe there will be some sort of justice after all?

Lobbyists against modification spend millions

In the first quarter of 09, the financial industry spent over $42 million dollars to defeat  mortgage modification in bankruptcy.  That doesn’t count what was spent in the month of April in an effort to avoid leveling the playing field on home loan modifications.

All of this money to preserve the right to lose a bunch of money foreclosing on houses that become less valuable with each foreclosure.  I’m sure this must make sense to someone….

What now, naysayers?

The Senate bill to allow Chapter 13 plans to modify home mortgages went down to defeat last week.  I am still waiting for those who couldn’t vote for this change in bankruptcy law to propose a solution to underwater homes, adjusting rate mortgages, and neighborhoods full of bank owned homes.

Have we rejected the “good” in quest for the “perfect”?  Have we knuckled to bank lobbying?  Are we just too stuck in old ways of thinking that we can’t explore bolder  alternatives?

I suspect my anger over this defeat will subside, but not soon as I face another week of appointments with people facing the loss of their homes.  My collection of options for them remains limited.

And I’ll wait, not so patiently, for the naysayers to propose their foreclosure fix.

Helping Families Save Homes defeated in the Senate

A modified version of the Helping Families Save Their Homes In Bankruptcy Act of 2009 went down to defeat on Thursday, April 30, 2009.  60 votes were needed to pass the legislation and only 45 Senators voted in favor.

This vision was appended by an amendment to a financial act with a number of provisions unrelated to bankruptcy or foreclosure.  Nonetheless, the best chance to see this legislation become law this year has probably just passed.

Bankruptcy judges will continue to have authority to modify almost any other kind of loan except those secured by a personal residence.  That still leaves Chapter 13 bankruptcy as one way to offer some relief to a family struggling to keep their home.  It may not be enough, and the Act would have made a huge difference and saved many homes.  Maybe next year…