Loan Modification

Getting Assistance from HUD Counselors

As a bankruptcy lawyer I talk to homeowners every day who are trying to obtain a loan modification. So many of them have been at it for 18 months or more and are ready to throw in the towel.

The combination of filing for Ch 13 and working with a HUD counselor seems to be getting the best results. We send our clients to Surepath Financial for help dealing with their lender, but provide a list of others in the area as well.
When choosing someone to help with a loan modification it is important to go to a counselor approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for FREE assistance. You should NEVER be asked to pay for counseling or a loan modification.
Here are a number of HUD-Approved counseling services in and around Santa Clara County:
SUREPATH FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS

1190 South Bascom Avenue, Ste 208
San Jose, California 95128

PHONE: 877-615-7873
E-MAIL: clientservices@surepath.org
WEBSITE: www.surepath.org

- Counselors speak English and Spanish

AFFORDABLE HOUSING CENTERS OF AMERICA

395 E. Taylor St. Suite 230
San Jose, California 95112

PHONE: 408-297-3053
E-MAIL: jgaleano@ahcoa.org
WEBSITE: www.ahcoa.org

- Counselors speak English and Spanish

PROJECT SENTINEL

298 S. Sunnyvale Avenue, Suite 209
Sunnyvale, California 94086

PHONE: 408-720-9888 x 16
TOLL FREE: 888-331-3332
E-MAIL: mediate4us@housing.org
WEBSITE: www.housing.org

- Counselors speak English, Spanish, Chinese Mandarin, Hindi

PROJECT SENTINEL

7800 Arroyo Circle, Bldg A
Gilroy, California 95020

PHONE: 408-842-7740
TOLL FREE: 888-331-3332
E-MAIL: gilroy@housing.org
WEBSITE: www.housing.org

- Counselors speak English and Spanish
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES SILICON VALLEY

1156 North Fourth Street
San Jose, California 95112

PHONE: 408-279-2600
WEBSITE: www.nhssv.org

- Counselors speak English, Spanish, Hmong and Vietnamese

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Keisha Woods, Housing Program Manager
1836 Bay Road, Suite B
East Palo Alto, California 94303

PHONE: 650-328-1890×110
E-MAIL: keisha@norcaludc.org
WEBSITE: www.norcaludc.org

- Counselors speak English and Spanish
AVENIDAS

450 Bryant St
Palo Alto, California 94301

PHONE: 650-289-5433
E-MAIL: hlandsman@avenidas.org
WEBSITE: www.avenidas.org

– English Only

NATIONAL ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION

1535 Landess Avenue, Suite 146
Milpitas, California 95035

PHONE: 408-343-7701

- English Only

*** If you are outside Santa Clara County, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has a list of approved counseling agencies by State. You can access the list here.
Once you’ve set out on the path of seeking a mortgage modification consider the following tips.
• Do not let anyone pressure you into signing papers right away. Take your time to decide, and get more than one opinion on your situation.
• Do not sign your deed over to anyone if you are applying for a mortgage modification
• NEVER make a mortgage payment to anyone other than your mortgage servicer without its express approval

How Could HAMP be Better?

The Home Affordable Modification Program (a.k.a. HAMP) may be doing some good for a handful of people.  But, if there is something that everyone agrees with, it is that the program needs some changes.

Alys Cohen and Diane Thompson of the National Consumer Law Center released a list of recommendations on July 6th that recommends greater visibility, principal reductions and access to the program for those in bankruptcy.

Greater Visibility:

Right now the Net Present Value (“NPV”) test used under HAMP to qualify borrowers for the program is not available to the public.  As a result, homeowners seeking a modification are dependent on the servicers who are not motivated to modify a borrower’s loan, but are motivated to collect the debt and continue to accumulate fees and costs under their servicing agreements.

With no one monitoring the “negotiation” on the other end of the telephone line, who is to know whether the borrower qualifies or if the servicers are just playing games to get homeowners in fear of foreclosure to send them money with hopes of a modification.

Many homeowners are finding out that the money they sent to the servicer went to pay penalties and interest, not towards payments for their trial modification or towards paying down the principal of their loan.

Those in charge of reviewing homeowner situations, qualifying homeowners and making the modifications must have an interest in providing homeowners with relief.  Homeowners need relief in order to prevent foreclosures and not simply delay them while payments are made to a servicer who only provides hope that a modification may occur sometime in the future.

Principal Reductions:

Forbearance works in some cases, but in most of the cases in California forbearance is none other than wishful thinking.  Values have dropped so far in most areas that even if forbearance were applied to a borrower’s situation it would take years before the homeowner has any equity.

Without principal reductions most homeowners are left with no realistic option to keep their home and must turn to short sales, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, or surrender in bankruptcy.

Access to HAMP for those in Bankruptcy:

Currently HAMP guidelines allow servicers to decide whether or not they make modifications available to homeowners in bankruptcy. Cohen and Thompson recommend that HAMP guidelines provide clear guidance to servicers dealing with a homeowner in bankruptcy.

Specifically, they recommend the guidelines include;

1) Upon receipt of a bankruptcy filing, servicers be required to send information about the HAMP program to the debtor or debtor’s cousel,

2) Servicers should work through debtor”s counsel and offer appropriate laon modifications under the HAMP guidelines,

3) The bankruptcy trustee should be copied on all communications,and

4) The communications should not infer that it is in any way an attempt to collect a debt.

Conclusion

Everyone agrees that change is needed to provide  relief to homeowners.  I suppose part of the problem is that those interested in change are not as well funded or united as the banks and mortgage servicers paying our decision makers to bring about the change.

After all, who received billions of dollars in taxpayer money when they couldn’t pay their bills, over exteneded thier credit and made bad decisions? Those who have been provided relief continue to deny relief to the very people who made help available to them in the first instance.

The MHA’s Second Lien Program: Medicine for Modification Nightmares

If you have been dreaming about reducing the interest on your second mortgage down to 1% and extending the term out as far as your first loan, you can make your dreams a reality by applying for a modification or refinance from the Obama Administration.

Enhancements to the Making Home Affordable (“MHA”) plan announced in late April were made, at least in part, because of complications second mortgages presented banks when attempting to modify or refinance a first mortgage. The new provisions, along with the integration of the Hope for Homeowners program, will assist even underwater borrowers by requiring write downs in order to increase homeowner equity, or at least subdue the urge to simply walk away.

Details of the Making Home Affordable Program Update spell out what can be done for amortizing loans as well as interest-only loans.

Amortizing Loans: (Loans on which borrowers make principal as well as interest payments)  Participating servicers are required to take specific steps when modifying amortizing liens in the second position.

1) Interest rate reduction down to 1 %,

2) Extension of the term to that of the modified first mortgage,

3) Principal forbearance on the first lien, with the option of extinguishing principal under what the MHA plan calls the Extingueshment Schedule.

Of course there is a catch, there is always a catch,

4) After five years, the interest rate on the lien in the second position will adjust to the current interest rate on the first mortgage,

5) The lien in the second position will then re-amortize over the remaining term at the higher interest rate, and

6) Investors receive an incentive payment from the U.S. Treasury equal to one half of the difference between the 1% interest rate floor and the modified interest rate on the first lien.

Interest-Only Loans: (Loans on which borrowers make only interest payments) In the case of an interest only loan, servicers are to

1) Reduce the interest rate down to 2%,

2) Forbear principal in the same proportion as forbearance on the first lien,

3) Extinguish principal under the Extinguishment Schedule, if any,

4) After five years the interest rate steps up to the interest rate on the modified first mortgage,

5) The lien in the second position amortizes either over the remaining term of the modified first loan or the originally scheduled amortization term, which ever is longer, and amortization begins at the time specified in the original contract,

6) Investors receive an incentive payment from the U.S. Treasury equal to one half of the difference between the 2% interest rate floor and the modified interest rate on the first lien.

There are also a pay-for-success structure for the second lien program similar to the first lien modification program.  Servicers can be paid $500 up-front for a successful modification and borrowers can receive up to $250 per year for as many as 5 years.  Payments made to the borrower are applied to the principal due on the first mortgage.

To give an incentive to lenders for extinguishing a second mortgage the MHA second lien program provides for an Extinguishment Price Schedule. The Extinguishment Schedule ranges from $.04 to $.12 for every dollar of debt extinguished for loans that are less than 180 days past due at the time of modification.  For loans more than 180 days past due at the time of modification there is no schedule and the lender/investor is paid $.03 for every dollar of debt extinguished.

Thus far the Obama Administration’s solution has been one of financial bargaining with banks, servicers and investors.  The money that borrowers receive in these plans amount to a reduction in loan principle, which is only another payment to the bank.

Time will tell if these changes are effective or whether the borrowers eventually end up in bankruptcy or foreclosure.  Not to mention having the banks and GSEs converting to property managers! For anyone who owns an investment property and can attest to what a headache it is, maybe there will be some sort of justice after all?

Incentives We Have: Motivation We NEED!

Yesterday the Obama Administration released the names of 6 mortgage companies participating in its Making Home Affordable.  Today it was announced that the number of American households threatened with losing their homes grew 24%.

While the Administration’s plan provides incentives to those involved in a refinance, modification, short sale or deed in lieu, it has to be clear to the American public that the plan is worth little absent a real motivating factor.

Don’t get me wrong, the Washington think-tank that came up with the plan did a fantastic job structuring a solution to the problem they were given.  But the crux of the plan’s success depends on our elected officials in Washington passing legislation making it possible for a bankruptcy judge to modify a debtor’s loan in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.

Without the threat of a cram down ,a bank’s corporate executives have little choice but to do their duty, and make decisions based on what is best for their company.  Until the possibility of a cram down in bankruptcy becomes reality, things are going to need to get a lot worse before banks stop taking government hand outs and start making loan modifications that aren’t just for show.

Make no mistake, things will get better.  If you have any doubt read Chuck Lorre Production’s Vanity Card #248.   It is one of my favorites.